
This week's news from the Silicon Valley based organization
Green Wifi got me thinking if such projects/gadgets really make sense. The definition of what a gadget is is totally subjective and largely depends on living standard. While for Steve Jobs a gadget thing would be (and for all of us) an outerspace flight on board a space shuttle, for the average high-tech person this might start with e.g. a Breitling watch or a sports car. Now for someone living in rural India e.g. a gadget starts much lower priced and could entail eating enough or simply having access to clean water. The proponents of organizations like Green Wifi or the more famous One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) initiative that proposes a $100 laptop seem to me a bit off their - certainly well meant - goals. As the
Indian education minister just recently commented on the $100 project:
"We need classrooms and teachers more urgently than fancy tools."
This is a view held by a number of government agencies and nongovernmental organizations (NGO) who hold that the focus on taking technology to India's poor overlooks other key requirements like water, food, and basic education of the country's deprived sections.
The above statement makes sense and lets projects like the mentioned two look a bit like theoretical patchworks from some high-tech industry people who have worked themself their entire lives in high-tech and now feel for whatever reason responsible for doing something for the much less fortunate in the poor areas of the world.
I would also like to add one other point. First of all setting the right priorities seems mandatory; someone having no education or access to sufficient food and drinking sources will not sit under a shady tree with a limited $100 PC (I assume that laptop does actually not even have wireless connectivity) and connect to a solar powered access point in reach. Secondly, I question if those initiatives are not even enlarging the digital divide if they provide such nations with "second class, very limited" Internet access and $100 PCs? I am sure people in Bangalore only have top-notch IT infrastructure to be able to offer services that are practically identical to what the guys in Silicon Valley or elsewhere do. Only if someone has a chance to move up to such a group do PC and Internet savviness make any sense to me. Solar-powered Wifi access points and $100 PCs seem a bit far away from this.
So to sum things up. I think what all those organizations should really do is work very closely with the folks in those countries who are working on helping the less fortunate poor day-to-day. When basic things are provided then Internet access with good performance PCs in PC /Internet equipped schools could be a next step - but not the first. Until then any money should be spent for what the Indian minister mentioned, I think, and often probably for even more basic things. If you don't know how to read/write, or struggle to feed yourself, Internet surfing is not that cool a gadget.