Francis reported below on the beta testing launch of The Venice Project. While we are still impressed by KaZaA and Skype founders' ability to make their ventures really work - and cash in, big time - I am a bit sceptical of this one. Have they taken on a challenge too far, this time?
My doubts come from some basic considerations. The whole thing is only going to take off IF they can attract big audiences, where advertisers will be motivated to spend money on targeted ads. But who are those end users? They said it is not the YouTube crowd since they won't be offering the video sharing that made YouTube so interesting to many people. (of course YouTube has not figured out yet how to make money with it). Now who currently watches TV channels on their PC? Nobody. How many watch IPTV right now on their TV set? Nearly nobody, and if so then over incumbents' or cable providers' networks, using their TV services and NOT over the public Internet. Ok, there are no HDTV broadcast TV sources available right now and that's why they have "near high-definition" in their news announcement, but that won't attract anybody either, I think. Also because in the next few years this is what we will get via terrestrial networks anyway, it will then become a commodity.
Again, if, and only if they attract millions of end users will anyone spend ad money, and will interesting content providers offer their TV channels. If not - and I cannot see where the users will come from - this remains a venture more likely to float elegantly around Venice itself than become an aggressive airborne broadcast TV market challenger.
What's missing here is someone - Apple, maybe? - to add at least one missing piece. The TV/Internet box cool enough, like iPod stuff, to attract the masses. The problem, of course, being that Apple will offer all that content (VoD, video clips, TV and radio channels, music etc.) themselves.